|
Project update - April 2005
Elephants, Crops & People, Uganda
The history of Uganda evokes images of genocide,
poverty and corruption and, in terms of wildlife and tourism,
the worst ivory poaching that Africa experienced bringing rhino
to extinction and elephant numbers crashing by 95%. -------- Stop
that thought, whack the brakes on! --------- that was over two
decades ago before and in the early days of Margaret Thatcher!
Today, Uganda is a very different country.
It is a story of courage and gradual stability brought about by
President Yoweri Museveni. This has been matched by the growing
self-esteem and ability of the people. Wanton destruction has
been replaced by regeneration; poverty into grass root self belief;
economic collapse into acclaimed recovery; ignorance into education
enrichment for everyone.
When quizzed on the state of wildlife and
conservation in Uganda, Michael Keigwin (Founder Trustee of the
Uganda Conservation Foundation and DSWF ECP project) said:
"Uganda is lucky to be so fertile
and to have been blessed with an abundance of natural resources
and welcoming people. There is potential everywhere. However,
whether it is acknowledged or lost is another question altogether!
Her wildlife has prospered over the past two decades; there is
plenty of game to see in the main 'honey pot' areas. Elsewhere
the recovery will take a few more decades and needs much more
law enforcement and judicial support."
Land availability for wildlife crashed from
60% to less than 3% within four decades. People have encroached
into every corner and pose continual pressure from cultivation,
deforestation, mining and poaching.
"The result is the gradual demise and erosion of a proud
people's heritage and one of the World's and Uganda's most acclaimed
and valuable protected area systems. Yet the potential for the
region and for Ugandans, in terms of revenue generation, international
acclaim and development and employment, is vast",
he added.
Ugandan wildlife management involves brave
wardens and rangers who protect their parks both from poachers
and those trying to abuse the system for personal gain. This is
often extremely dangerous work. They are the unsung heroes, and
it is they who protect vital fisheries, water catchments, forests
and wildlife. This is crucial for basic human survival and the
future prosperity of the area.
However, they also protect the local communities
from wildlife and where possible, share a percentage of park revenues
with the bordering communities. These would be specialist jobs
anywhere else in the world, yet in Uganda, the Ugandan wildlife
staff roll their sleeves up and do their best. The fact remains,
whilst there are benefits to a recovery and the protection of
vital 'life and industry resources', there are costs. These affect
the subsistence farmers when the recovery of the elephant population
results in the destruction of their crops - these are the silent
victims of Uganda Wildlife Authorities (UWA) management success.
They should not be forgotten, lest they find themselves forced
to break the law in order to survive. Their plight does not reach
the worldwide press: of being unable to feed their families or
of sending their children to school due to elephant damage to
their crops property or even to loss of life. These are the same
communities that endured the Amin era, the Rwanda genocide, Interhamwe
and ADF rebel attacks, the Kunungu Cult murders, malnutrition,
malaria and of course, HIV.
For eight years, Michael Keigwin has cut
through the popular project regions and fashions and got stuck
into an area and people in crisis.
Michael's stance is hard: "These
are good people and under no circumstances should we expect them
to be in this situation. They need employment opportunities, protection
from the wildlife and the security to give them self belief. The
conservation world has few doers and many talkers. All too often
conservation revolves around observing problems rather than solving
them, writing enormous reports, and doing little about them; and
finally moving on to the next topical crisis".
His conservation based management orientated
research project focused on the vital and largest area connecting
the Parc National des Virunga, Democratice Republic of Congo (DRC)
and Uganda's Queen Elizabeth National Park. It focused on two
industrial areas, wildlife conservation and tourism, and agriculture.
He found no officials during his feasibility study who could tell
him what was left of the elephant population, whether it was viable
and what the threats were to the elephants; neither could he find
out what was being done to resolve the 'denied' crop raiding problem.
He, single handily, raised just about enough funds to operate,
and for eight years, unpaid, has provided the basis for action
- which has already started. DSWF picked up on his efforts in
1999 and has continued to support ECP ever since.
Melanie Shepherd says
"Worldwide conservation had forgotten this region and Elephants
Crops People (ECP) was the first ever project to focus on these
trans-boundary elephants. With Queen Elizabeth Conservation Area
(QECA)/ Parc Nationale de Virunga being the largest network of
protected areas in the Albertine Rift which includes this area
of extraordinary biodiversity, we at the DSWF supported ECP's
determination. Thanks to ECP, we now know that this area contains
the largest and most viable elephant population in Uganda and
in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, many of which are
migratory. We now know what and where the critical threats are
and dare push to solve them".
The QECA region is estimated always to hold
between 500 to 1000 elephants within the Maramagambo Forest and
south to the Ishasha River. These elephants remain aggregated
due to their fear of humans and hide in forested areas during
the daytime. However, at night the elephants' attention turns
to feeding on the subsistence farmers' crops along the hard edge
Eastern Border of QE. Despite ECP not recording evidence of direct
poaching pressure in Southern QECA, the community are killing
elephants in retaliation to crop raiding, using poisoned spears
and arrows. There are also casualties when elephant are hit by
speeding lorries and coaches. We would estimate that some 15 to
20 elephants are killed through Elephant - Human Interaction across
QE each year. However, the most significant losses are in the
DRC where armies are also heavily involved in poaching wildlife.
Elephant - Human Interaction in QECA is
one of the most significant problems that the park faces, and
it is getting much worse as the human population soars. Since
2001 ECP has recorded every single incident of crop raiding in
this region.
One law abiding but poverty stricken farmer
explained: "How can I
be expected not to take water, wood and wildlife from the park.
For decades I have cultivated my small half acre piece of land
to feed my parents, my wife and my children and each season the
elephants trample and eat my food. My family goes hungry. How
do I stop them? I can't, but who will? I get no compensation and
get told to 'keep happy about the wildlife animals' that threaten
me every day. This is my land, my country and my family - these
are my crops and my goats - I am simple but the park bleeds me".
ECP has shown that this park border region
experienced 1403 crop raids between May 2001 and July 2003. These
raids are spread along the 50km border, and for over two decades
have exacerbated the poverty and hunger in the region. Without
compensation the communities face a torrid time, and are extremely
keen to resolve this acute problem.
With 100% of the raids being at night, it
makes chasing the elephants very dangerous - especially as 75%
of the crop raiding is being done by family groups - who will
defend their young against people chasing them out of crops.
However, ECP went on to show that 76% of
the crop raiding is happening in the Ntungwe region and is worst
between May - July and December - January, just when the crops
are nearing maturity. The Ishasha Region has its worst crop raiding
between December - March. In both regions 93% of the crop raiding
has been within 1km of the border. The damage, therefore, is very
localised and tends to affect the same families. With this data,
efforts to reduce the problems can be focused and be far more
effective.
With low ranger numbers for law enforcement,
and with the essential anti-poaching operations, crop raiding
puts a further strain on already stretched resources. ECP, having
targeted and understood the growing problem, is now ready to offer
support towards the park's ability to reduce this ever-increasing
problem.
Thanks to DSWF we are reopening access roads,
providing rangers with bicycles and making them more able to react
to crop raiding situations; communications systems between the
farmers and the rangers are being put in to enable a quick reaction
force to get to crop raiding situations. We have also donated
mosquito nets to help keep Rangers malaria free and thus increase
their presence in the park. ECP is also looking to dig a trench
along the Bukorwe ridge to support the temporary efforts at containing
the elephants.
About 50 miles north of Ishasha is the vital
400km² Kitomi Forest Reserve. It is one of the extremely
important connections between the immensely biodiverse and rich
habitats that contribute to QECA's network of parks and habitats.
It is also the most vulnerable.
When Dr Emily Otali, the Uganda Conservation
Foundation project officer, was asked why it was so vulnerable,
she said:
"It is under extreme pressure
by encroachment, illegal charcoal making, deforestation and poaching.
We know that well over 200 elephants use it on a seasonal basis
and that there are around 390 chimpanzee and other critically
endangered flora and fauna species at risk".
She explained why the area could not be
protected as an isolated area:
" For a chimpanzee population
to be viable there must be well over 400, which we fall short
on. However with the adjoining Kyambura Wildlife Reserve chimps,
both populations are made viable! As for the elephants, they continuously
come and go through what is left of the Kyambura - Kitomi forest
connection, except now the migration passage means there is no
alternative to moving through illegal crop and farms - of course
they devastate the farms".
She was right. On inspection there remain
only 100 metres width of connection left. That is on an escarpment,
which is impassable by elephants. The Uganda Conservation Foundation
identified this and has already undertaken a feasibility study
with the Jane Goodall Institute and National Forestry Authority
in order to increase the low levels of protection and policing
of the area. Along with UCF's support to the tourism sector, Michael
Keigwin is looking to ensure a permanent presence and sustainable
income to deter all illegal activity in Kitomi.
Michael proposes that the UCF partnership
will clear the region of its snares and traps, pursue professional
law enforcement BUT to do this alongside a well thought out education
and local community revenue sharing and employment scheme.
"This is just common sense - not rocket science. The area
can and should be a better economic and natural resource, without
destroying it!"
Forests can regenerate fast and it is believed
that with swift action, success can be attained. However, it is
abundantly obvious to everyone who is in the front line of wildlife
management and conservation, that the longer the problems are
left, the more irreversible they become. We cannot wait for wildlife
conservation and forward thinking 'industry politicians' to be
voted in. People will vote for what is good for them right now.
They will vote for those who will not deny them access to protected
and uncultivated, 'free' land and resources.
The partial success story is one that has
not ended. Subsistence farming will one day be replaced by mechanised
industry and there will be a landscape of extremely defined protected
area borders. These are revolutions that are already emerging
under the progress banner. Let us not forget the economic investment
value that protected areas have brought: tourism, roads, communications,
clean water, employment, trading markets and so on
.
Uganda is regenerating and recovering but
not sustainably, and continues to lose its life supporting landscape
heritage, so crucial to future economic investment, human survival
and prosperity. Wise and constructive actions are needed now to
solve this urgent problem.
In summary:
- After
a long period of strife, Uganda is now a stable fertile country
with abundant wildlife
- Land availability for wildlife
has crashed from 60% to just 3% in 40 years
- Ugandan wildlife management
rangers not only protect parks but also local communities from
elephants raiding crops
- Local
communities need employment opportunities and, protection from
wildlife raids
- Michael
Keigwin's conservation based management orientated research
project focuses on the vital and largest area connecting the
Parc National des Virunga DRC and Uganda's Queen Elizabeth National
Park. DSWF has funded this work since 1999.
- Elephants
Crops and People was the first ever project to focus on tran-sboundary
elephants.
- The QECA region is estimated
always to hold between 500 to 1000 elephants within the Maramagambo
Forest and south to the Ishasha River which is the largest and
most viable elephant population in Uganda and in the Eastern
DRC, many of which are migratory.
- Elephant
- Human Interaction and conflict is one of the most significant
problems that the area faces, and it is getting much worse with
15 to 20 elephants killed through elephant - human interaction
annually
- 93% of
the crop raiding has been within 1km of the border with very
localised damage affecting the same families. With this data,
efforts to reduce the problems can be focused and be far more
effective.
- The Kitomi
Forest Reserve is an important 'corridor' between the immensely
biodiverse and rich habitats under extreme pressure by human
encroachment, illegal charcoal making, deforestation and poaching
with over 200 elephants and around 390 chimpanzee and other
critically endangered flora and fauna species at risk.
- Elephants
use what is left of the Kyambura - Kitomi forest connection
having to migrate through a narrow 100 metre passage leaving
them no alternative to moving through crops.
- A well
thought out education and local community revenue sharing and
employment scheme means a better economic and natural resource
and a reduction in the widespread destruction.
- Inevitable
progress means that subsistence farming will one day be replaced
by mechanised industry and there will be a landscape of extremely
defined protected area borders. Protected areas have brought
investment in: tourism, roads, communications, clean water,
employment and trading market and will need to be continued
to be protected against progress in their borders.
- Wise
and constructive actions are needed now to solve the urgent
problem of Uganda needing regeneration using sustainable methods
or it will continue to lose its landscape heritage which is
crucial to future economic investment, human survival and prosperity.
Every little contribution helps wildlife
and remember 100% of your donation will go in full to the project - thank you!
You can also help by becoming a member
of DSWF. Click here for more information
top of page
|